I haven't seen too many in-depth reviews on this, as most reviews cover manual scans (which yields entirely different results). While Avast may catch a competitive amount of infections, catching infections is only part of the battle. Check out AV-Comparatives's False Alarm test that covers the false alarms I'm referring to (different from false positive results for viruses). That really isn't what I'm talking about. 21 mb for 95% vs 250 mb for 97% is a big difference overall. such as "it caught 95% of the viruses but _ caught 97%" so yah it was not as good but the difference is not that much if resource usage is a concern. as i skimmed review after review for ideas to try out, avast was just a step behind the top rated ones. As for false alarms and vulnerabilities, it's little worse than the other top rated programs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |